4.5 Article

Mycoplasma bovis in Spanish Cattle Herds: Two Groups of Multiresistant Isolates Predominate, with One Remaining Susceptible to Fluoroquinolones

期刊

PATHOGENS
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens9070545

关键词

Mycoplasma bovis; minimum inhibitory concentration; antimicrobial resistance; mutations; Spain

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spanish Government) - FEDER funds [AGL2016-76568-R]
  2. State Subprogram Training of the State Program for the Promotion of Talent and its Employability [BES-2017-080186]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mycoplasma bovisis an important bovine pathogen causing pneumonia, mastitis, and arthritis and is responsible for major economic losses worldwide. In the absence of an efficient vaccine, control ofM. bovisinfections mainly relies on antimicrobial treatments, but resistance is reported in an increasing number of countries. To address the situation in Spain,M. boviswas searched in 436 samples collected from beef and dairy cattle (2016-2019) and 28% were positive. Single-locus typing usingpolCsequences further revealed that two subtypes ST2 and ST3, circulate in Spain both in beef and dairy cattle, regardless of the regions or the clinical signs. Monitoring of ST2 and ST3 isolates minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to a panel of antimicrobials revealed one major difference when using fluoroquinolones (FQL): ST2 is more susceptible than ST3. Accordingly, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) further identified mutations in thegyrAandparCregions, encoding quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDR) only in ST3 isolates. This situation shows the capacity of ST3 to accumulate mutations in QRDR and might reflect the selective pressure imposed by the extensive use of these antimicrobials. MIC values and detection of mutations by WGS also showed that most Spanish isolates are resistant to macrolides, lincosamides, and tetracyclines. Valnemulin was the only one effective, at least in vitro, against both STs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据