4.6 Article

Short Residence Times of DNA-Bound Transcription Factors Can Reduce Gene Expression Noise and Increase the Transmission of Information in a Gene Regulation System

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00067

关键词

residence time; transcription factor-DNA interaction; regulation of gene expression; gene expression noise; Information acquisition; stochastic processes; computational modeling and simulations

资金

  1. European Research Council [739874]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_172887]
  3. University Priority Research Program in Evolutionary Biology
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_172887] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene expression noise is not just ubiquitous but also variable, and we still do not understand some of the most elementary factors that affect it. Among them is the residence time of a transcription factor (TF) on DNA, the mean time that a DNA-bound TF remains bound. Here, we use a stochastic model of transcriptional regulation to study how residence time affects the gene expression noise that arises when a TF induces gene expression. We find that the effect of residence time on gene expression noise depends on the TF's concentration and its affinity to DNA, which determine the level of induction of the gene. At high levels of induction, residence time has no effect on gene expression noise. However, as the level of induction decreases, short residence times reduce gene expression noise. The reason is that fast on-off TF binding dynamics prevent long periods where proteins are predominantly synthesized or degraded, which can cause excessive fluctuations in gene expression. As a consequence, short residence times can help a gene regulation system acquire information about the cellular environment it operates in. Our predictions are consistent with the observation that experimentally measured residence times are usually modest and lie between seconds to minutes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据