4.7 Article

Metabolism of Soy Isoflavones by Intestinal Bacteria: Genome Analysis of an Adlercreutzia equolifaciens Strain That Does Not Produce Equol

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom10060950

关键词

soy isoflavones; daidzein; genistein; equol; Adlercreutzia equolifaciens; intestinal microorganisms; fecal microbiota

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [AGL2014-57820-R]
  2. Principality of Asturias [IDI/2018/000114]
  3. FPI Program from MINECO [BES-2015-072285]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Isoflavones are transformed in the gut into more estrogen-like compounds or into inactive molecules. However, neither the intestinal microbes nor the pathways leading to the synthesis of isoflavone-derived metabolites are fully known. In the present work, 73 fecal isolates from three women with an equol-producing phenotype were considered to harbor equol-related genes by qPCR. After typing, 57 different strains of different taxa were tested for their ability to act on the isoflavones daidzein and genistein. Strains producing small to moderate amounts of dihydrodaidzein and/orO-desmethylangolensin (O-DMA) from daidzein and dihydrogenistein from genistein were recorded. However, either alone or in several strain combinations, equol producers were not found, even though one of the strains, W18.34a (also known as IPLA37004), was identified asAdlercreutzia equolifaciens, a well-described equol-producing species. Analysis and comparison ofA. equolifaciensW18.34a andA. equolifaciensDSM19450(T)(an equol producer bacterium) genome sequences suggested a deletion in the former involving a large part of the equol operon. Furthermore, genome comparison ofA. equolifaciensandAsaccharobacter celatus(other equol-producing species) strains from databases indicated many of these also showed deletions within the equol operon. The present results contribute to our knowledge to the activity of gut bacteria on soy isoflavones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据