4.7 Review

Membrane Heterogeneity Controls Cellular Endocytic Trafficking

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00757

关键词

endosomal sorting; Rab11; retromer; retriever; clathrin; endophilin; CLIC; GEEC; phosphoinositide; phosphatidylserine

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [SNSF 31003A_172969]
  2. Thurgauische Stiftung fur Wissenschaft und Forschung
  3. State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [JR-RO 6238/1-1]
  5. Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund [GR-UOO1704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endocytic trafficking relies on highly localized events in cell membranes. Endocytosis involves the gathering of protein (cargo/receptor) at distinct plasma membrane locations defined by specific lipid and protein compositions. Simultaneously, the molecular machinery that drives invagination and eventually scission of the endocytic vesicle assembles at the very same place on the inner leaflet of the membrane. It is membrane heterogeneity - the existence of specific lipid and protein domains in localized regions of membranes - that creates the distinct molecular identity required for an endocytic event to occur precisely when and where it is required rather than at some random location within the plasma membrane. Accumulating evidence leads us to believe that the trafficking fate of internalized proteins is sealed following endocytosis, as this distinct membrane identity is preserved through the endocytic pathway, upon fusion of endocytic vesicles with early and sorting endosomes. In fact, just like at the plasma membrane, multiple domains coexist at the surface of these endosomes, regulating local membrane tubulation, fission and sorting to recycling pathways or to thetrans-Golgi network via late endosomes. From here, membrane heterogeneity ensures that fusion events between intracellular vesicles and larger compartments are spatially regulated to promote the transport of cargoes to their intracellular destination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据