4.4 Article

Adaptation of turnip mosaic potyvirus to a specific niche reduces its genetic and environmental robustness

期刊

VIRUS EVOLUTION
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ve/veaa041

关键词

experimental evolution; thermal fluctuations; mutagenesis; plant virus; plastogenetic congruence; robustness; virus evolution

类别

资金

  1. Spain's Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion-FEDER [BFU2015-65037-P]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [GRISOLIAP/2018/005, PROMETEO2019/012]
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion-FEDER [BES-2016-077078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Robustness is the preservation of the phenotype in the face of genetic and environmental perturbations. It has been argued that robustness must be an essential fitness component of RNA viruses owed to their small and compacted genomes, high mutation rates and living in ever-changing environmental conditions. Given that genetic robustness might hamper possible beneficial mutations, it has been suggested that genetic robustness can only evolve as a side-effect of the evolution of robustness mechanisms specific to cope with environmental perturbations, a theory known as plastogenetic congruence. However, empirical evidences from different viral systems are contradictory. To test how adaptation to a particular environment affects both environmental and genetic robustness, we have used two strains of turnip mosaic potyvirus (TuMV) that differ in their degree of adaptation to Arabidopsis thaliana at a permissive temperature. We show that the highly adapted strain is strongly sensitive to the effect of random mutations and to changes in temperature conditions. In contrast, the non-adapted strain shows more robustness against both the accumulation of random mutations and drastic changes in temperature conditions. Together, these results are consistent with the predictions of the plastogenetic congruence theory, suggesting that genetic and environmental robustnesses may be two sides of the same coin for TuMV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据