4.7 Article

Type I IFN response associated with mTOR activation in the TAFRO subtype of idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease

期刊

JCI INSIGHT
卷 5, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.135031

关键词

-

资金

  1. Castleman's Awareness & Research Effort/Castleman Disease Collaborative Network
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [1R01HL141408-01]
  3. Hematologic Malignancies Translational Center of Excellence of the Abramson Cancer Center
  4. University of Pennsylvania
  5. Uplifting Athletes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The TAFRO clinical subtype of idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD-TAFRO)is a rare hematologic illness involving episodic disease flares of thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, reticulin myelofibrosis, renal dysfunction, and organomegaly (TAFRO) and progressive multiple organ dysfunction. We previously showed that the mTOR signaling pathway is elevated in lymph nodes of iMCD-TAFRO patients and that an mTOR inhibitor is effective in a small cohort of patients. However, the upstream mechanisms, cell types, and mediators involved in disease pathogenesis remain unknown. Here, we developed a targeted approach to identify candidate cellular drivers and mechanisms in iMCD-TAFRO through cellular and transcriptomic studies. Using paired iMCD-TAFRO PBMC samples collected during flare and remission, we identified T cell activation and alterations in NK cell and monocyte subset frequencies during iMCD-TAFRO flare. These changes were associated with increased Type I IFN (IFN-1) response gene signatures across CD8* T cells, NK cells, and monocytes. Finally, we found that IFN-beta stimulation of monocytes and T cells from iMCD-TAFRO patient remission samples induced increased mTOR activation compared with healthy donors, and this was abrogated with either mTORC1 or JAK1/2 inhibition. The data presented here support a potentially novel role for IFN-1 signaling as a driver of increased mTOR signaling in iMCD-TAFRO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据