4.8 Review

Current understanding and challenges in high temperature additive manufacturing of engineering thermoplastic polymers

期刊

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
卷 34, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101218

关键词

3D printing; Material extrusion; Powder bed fusion; Thermoplastic processing; High temperature engineering thermoplastics

资金

  1. Adhesives and Sealants graduate research assistantship from the Macromolecules Innovation Institute (MII) at Virginia Tech
  2. Department of Energy's Kansas City National Security Campus [DE-NA0002839]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The strengths of additive manufacturing (AM), especially the tool-less manufacturing paradigm and rapid pro-duction of low-volume products, are well-aligned with the needs of manufacturing of expensive, high-tem-perature resistant, engineering thermoplastic polymers. High temperature polymer parts made with AM for either tooling or end-use applications have been implemented in the aerospace, automotive, and biomedical fields. However, parts made from these polymers using traditional manufacturing processes are generally high-value parts in low-quantity production runs. Moreover, AM processing of these polymers present significant challenges due to limitations associated with large thermal gradients, residual stress buildup, and interlayer adhesion as well as the inability of the printers to consistently maintain required high processing temperatures. This review highlights the current state of the art for processing high-temperature (i.e., traditional processing temperatures exceeding 250 degrees C) thermoplastic polymers by the melt-based, AM processes of material extrusion (MatEx) and laser powder bed fusion (PBF). The authors address common challenges to AM of high-temperature polymers and gaps in fundamental understanding of the process-structure-property relationships needed to identify the machine design, process parameter selection, and synthetic modifications to enable processing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据