4.7 Article

Gut microbiota regulate tumor metastasis via circRNA/miRNA networks

期刊

GUT MICROBES
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1788891

关键词

Gut microbiota; cancer; metastasis; circular RNA (circRNA); microRNA; interleukin-11(IL-11); cancer stem cell

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81372513]
  2. Shanghai Pujiang Program of China [15PJ1407500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Increasing evidence indicates that gut microbiota plays an important role in cancer progression. However, the underlying mechanism remains largely unknown. Here, we report that broad-spectrum antibiotics (ABX) treatment leads to enhanced metastasis by the alteration of gut microbiome composition. Methods Cancer LLC and B16-F10 cell metastasis mouse models, and microarray/RNA sequencing analysis were used to reveal the regulatory functions of microbiota-mediated circular RNA (circRNA)/microRNA (miRNA) networks that may contribute to cancer metastasis. Results The specific pathogen-free (SPF) mice with ABX treatment demonstrated enhanced lung metastasis. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from SPF mice or Bifidobacterium into germ-free mice significantly suppressed lung metastasis. Mechanistically, gut microbiota impacts circRNA expression to regulate levels of corresponding miRNAs. Specifically, such modulations of gut microbiota inhibit mmu_circ_0000730 expression in an IL-11-dependent manner. Bioinformatics analysis combined with luciferase reporter assays revealed reciprocal repression between mmu_circ_0000730 and mmu-miR-466i-3p. We further showed that both mmu-miR-466i-3p and mmu-miR-466 f-3p suppresses a number of genes involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and stemness of cancer stem cells such as SOX9. Conclusions These results provide evidence of a previously unrecognized regulatory role of non-coding RNAs in microbiota-mediated cancer metastasis, and thus, the microbiome may serve as a therapeutic target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据