4.6 Article

Purification of protein therapeutics via high-affinity supramolecular host-guest interactions

期刊

NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 4, 期 11, 页码 1044-+

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-020-0589-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute for Basic Science [IBS-R007-D1]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [4120200213576] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficient purification is crucial to providing large quantities of recombinant therapeutic proteins, such as monoclonal antibodies and cytokines. However, affinity techniques for manufacturing protein therapeutics that use biomolecule-conjugated agarose beads that harness specific biomolecular interactions suffer from issues related to protein denaturation, contamination and the need to maintain biomolecule-specific conditions for efficient protein capture. Here, we report a versatile and scalable method for the purification of recombinant protein therapeutics. The method exploits the high-affinity and controllable host-guest interactions between cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) and selected guests such as adamantylammonium. We show that the Herceptin (the brand name of trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody drug used to treat breast cancer) and the much smaller cytokine interferon alpha-2a can be purified by site-specifically tagging them with adamantylammonium using the enzyme sortase A, followed by high-affinity binding with CB[7]-conjugated agarose beads and the recovery of the protein using a guest with a stronger affinity for CB[7]. The thermal and chemical stability of CB[7] beads and their scalability, recyclability and low cost may also make them advantageous for the manufacturing of biosimilars. The high-affinity and controllable host-guest interactions between cucurbit[7]uril and selected guests enables a versatile and scalable method for the purification of recombinant protein therapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据