4.1 Article

Performance and exergy analysis of a diesel engine run on petrodiesel and biodiesel blends containing mixed CeO2 and MoO3 nanocatalyst

期刊

BIOFUELS-UK
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 1-7

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17597269.2020.1779976

关键词

Exergy analysis; nano cerium oxide (CeO2-MWCNT); nano molybdenum oxide (MoO3-MWCNT); diesel engine; diesel-biodiesel fuel blend

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the exergy of a diesel engine fueled with diesel-biodiesel blends and hybrid nanocatalyst additives was analyzed using the second law of thermodynamics. The results showed that increasing the amount of nanocatalysts in the fuel blends can improve the net exergy work rate and exergy efficiency of the diesel engine, while reducing pollutant emissions.
In this research, the second law of thermodynamics was employed to analyze the exergy of a diesel engine fueled with diesel-biodiesel blends (B5 and B10) and hybrid nanocatalyst additives at three concentrations (30, 60 and 90 ppm), containing cerium oxide and molybdenum oxide on amide-functionalized multiwall carbon nano tubes (MWCNTs). The research engine was a single-cylinder, four-stroke, direct-injection, air-cooled diesel engine. The exergy analysis was performed under full load conditions, at four engine speeds (1700, 2100, 2500 and 2900 rpm). The results revealed that by increasing the amount of nanocatalysts (CeO2-MWCNTs and MoO3-MWCNTs) in the fuel blends, the net exergy work rate of the diesel engine increased for both fuel blends (B5 and B10). The maximum net exergy work rate of the diesel engine was 7.71 (25.33% of total fuel exergy rate) for the B10 + 90ppm fuel blends at 2500 rpm. The exergy efficiency of the diesel engine ranged from 17.97% to 31% for B5 and 18.3% to 31.7% for B10 fuel blends, respectively. B10 containing 90 ppm nanocatalyst showed the highest exergy efficiency, at an engine speed of 1700 rpm. All fuel blends containing nanocatalyst emitted less carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon and NO(x)compared with nanocatalyst-free fuel blends.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据