4.5 Article

Catalytic pyrolysis of cellulose over solid acidic catalysts: an environment-friendly method for furan production

期刊

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 2695-2702

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-020-00812-z

关键词

Cellulose; Catalytic cracking; Pyrolysis; Furans; Solid acidic catalysts

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31870570, 31670599]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [20720170043]
  3. Scientific Research Start-up Funding for Special Professor of Minjiang Scholars, Xiamen University, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a study on the production of furan compounds via catalytic pyrolysis of cellulose on a two-staged fixed-bed reactor using four solid acidic catalysts. The selectivity of furans varies with different catalysts, with TS-1 and Nb2O5 showing higher selectivity and ZSM-5 and γ-Al2O3 lowering the furan selectivity. The relationship between the physicochemical properties of catalysts and their catalytic selectivity towards furan compounds was discussed based on characterization results.
The production of high-valuable chemicals, such as furans, from biomass is a hot topic in the past decade. It used to be abstracted from fossil resources. This paper presents a study on the production of furan compounds via catalytic pyrolysis of cellulose on a two-staged fixed-bed reactor. Four solid acidic catalysts including Nb2O5, gamma-Al2O3, ZSM-5, and TS-1, were used for the catalytic cracking. The selectivity of furans is 9.6% in a blank test and increased to 43.9% and 20.7% over TS-1 and Nb2O5, respectively. Nevertheless, ZSM-5 and gamma-Al(2)O(3)lowered the furan selectivity to 6.8% and 8.8%, respectively. The relationship between the physicochemical properties of different catalysts and their catalytic selectivity towards furan compounds were discussed based on characterization results of N(2)physisorption, XRD, NH3-TPD, Py-IR, and TG/DTG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据