4.7 Article

The difference of soil properties between pure and mixed Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantations depends on tree species

期刊

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01009

关键词

Physicochemical property; Soil quality; Soil nutrient; Chinese fir

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31870620]
  2. 948 Project of State Forestry Administration of China [2015-4-31]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Second generation Chinese fir plantation has occurred the problem of site deterioration, which is usually supposed to be solved by mixed plantation. Here, we determined the physicochemical properties of six soil layers in pure and three types of mixed Chinese fir plantation stands (admixed species: Michelia macclurei, Pinus massoniana, and Phyllostachys heterocycla) in southeast China. The Ph. heterocycla is a bamboo. The effects of plantation type and depth on soil properties and variations among different depths were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey's test. Non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to analyze the soil property differences between pure and mixed plantations. The soil organic matter and alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen of mixture of Chinese fir and Ph. heterocycla were significantly higher than those of other plantation types (p < 0.05). The variations of soil chemical properties in pure plantation were significantly greater than these in mixed plantation. The soil organic matter in 10-20 cm soil layer, alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen in 10-40 cm, total phosphorus in 0-40 cm, available phosphorus and rapidly available potassium in nearly all soil layers were significantly lower in pure plantation than that in mixed plantation. In general, the mixed Chinese fir plantation could improve the soil quality, especially for chemical properties. Further investigations into the effects of mixing proportions of tree species on soil properties are needed to explore the effect of tree species on soil quality. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据