4.6 Article

A Study to Investigate the Mechanical Properties of Recycled Carbon Fibre/Glass Fibre-Reinforced Epoxy Composites Using a Novel Thermal Recycling Process

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr8080954

关键词

manufacturing waste; carbon fibre; glass fibre; thermal recycling; compression moulding; mechanical properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Manufacturing-based carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) wastes (pre-consumer waste) were recycled to recover valuable carbon fibres (CFs) and glass fibres (GFs), utilising a novel thermal recycling process with a cone calorimeter setup. The ideal conditions to recycle both the fibres occurred at 550 degrees C in atmospheric pressure. The processing time in the batch reactor to recycle CFs was 20-25 min, and to recycle GFs it was 25-30 min. The recovery rate of the recycled CFs was 95-98 wt%, and for GFs it was 80-82 wt%. Both the recycled fibres possessed a 100-110 mm average length. The resin phase elimination was verified by employing scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Furthermore, the fibres were manually realigned, compression moulded at room temperature, and cured for 24 h by a laminating epoxy resin system. The newly manufactured CFRP and GFRP composites were continuous (uniform length from end to end), unidirectionally oriented (0 degrees), and non-woven. The composites were produced in two fibre volumes: 40 wt% and 60 wt%. The addition of approximate to 20 wt% recycled CFs increased the tensile strength (TS) by 12%, young modulus (YM) by 34.27% and impact strength (IS) by 7.26%. The addition of approximate to 20 wt% recycled GFs increased the TS by 75.14%, YM by 12.23% and the IS by 116.16%. The closed-loop recycling approach demonstrated in this study can effectively recycle both CFRP and GFRP manufacturing wastes. Preserving the structural integrity of the recycled fibres could be an advantage, enabling recycling for a specified number of times.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据