4.6 Article

Identification of Immune-Related Prognostic Biomarkers Based on the Tumor Microenvironment in 20 Malignant Tumor Types With Poor Prognosis

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01008

关键词

prognostic biomarkers; tumor microenvironment; stromal score; immune score; TCGA

类别

资金

  1. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program [81920108024]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project Precision Medical Research [2017YFC0909900]
  3. Southwest Hospital Artificial Intelligence Medical Project [SWH2017ZDCX4210]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer, especially malignant tumors with poor prognosis, has become a major hazard to human life and health. The tumor microenvironment is gaining increasing attention from researchers, as it offers a new focus for tumor diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis. The numbers of immune and stromal cells, which are major components of the tumor microenvironment, could be determined from RNA-seq data with the Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in Malignant Tumors using Expression data (ESTIMATE) algorithm. To explore the effects of immune and stromal cells on tumor prognosis, we analyzed associations between overall survival and immune/stromal scores for 20 malignant tumor types based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data. For six of the 20 tumor types, we observed statistically significant associations. Furthermore, to better explain the predictive ability of these scores, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in groups of cases with high or low immune or stromal scores for each of these six malignant tumor types. In addition, a list of immune-related genes was screened to identify prognostic predictors for one or more tumor types. Thus, multi-database joint analysis can provide a new approach to the assessment of tumor prognosis and allow the identification of related genes that may be new biomarkers for tumor metastasis and prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据