4.6 Article

Economic Evaluation of Population-BasedBRCA1/BRCA2Mutation Testing across Multiple Countries and Health Systems

期刊

CANCERS
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12071929

关键词

BRCA; population testing; cost-effectiveness; ovarian cancer; breast cancer; cancer prevention

类别

资金

  1. Barts Cancer Research UK Centre for Excellence, Queen Mary University of London [C16420/A18066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical criteria/Family history-basedBRCAtesting misses a large proportion ofBRCAcarriers who can benefit from screening/prevention. We estimate the cost-effectiveness of population-basedBRCAtesting in general population women across different countries/health systems. A Markov model comparing the lifetime costs and effects ofBRCA1/BRCA2testing all general population women >= 30 years compared with clinical criteria/FH-based testing. Separate analyses are undertaken for the UK/USA/Netherlands (high-income countries/HIC), China/Brazil (upper-middle income countries/UMIC) and India (low-middle income countries/LMIC) using both health system/payer and societal perspectives.BRCAcarriers undergo appropriate screening/prevention interventions to reduce breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk. Outcomes include OC, BC, and additional heart disease deaths and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Probabilistic/one-way sensitivity analyses evaluate model uncertainty. For the base case, from a societal perspective, we found that population-basedBRCAtesting is cost-saving in HIC (UK-ICER = $-5639/QALY; USA-ICER = $-4018/QALY; Netherlands-ICER = $-11,433/QALY), and it appears cost-effective in UMIC (China-ICER = $18,066/QALY; Brazil-ICER = $13,579/QALY), but it is not cost-effective in LMIC (India-ICER = $23,031/QALY). From a payer perspective, population-basedBRCAtesting is highly cost-effective in HIC (UK-ICER = $21,191/QALY, USA-ICER = $16,552/QALY, Netherlands-ICER = $25,215/QALY), and it is cost-effective in UMIC (China-ICER = $23,485/QALY, Brazil-ICER = $20,995/QALY), but it is not cost-effective in LMIC (India-ICER = $32,217/QALY).BRCAtesting costs below $172/test (ICER = $19,685/QALY), which makes it cost-effective (from a societal perspective) for LMIC/India. Population-basedBRCAtesting can prevent an additional 2319 to 2666 BC and 327 to 449 OC cases per million women than the current clinical strategy. Findings suggest that population-basedBRCAtesting for countries evaluated is extremely cost-effective across HIC/UMIC health systems, is cost-saving for HIC health systems from a societal perspective, and can prevent tens of thousands more BC/OC cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据