4.6 Article

A novel Cas9-targeted long-read assay for simultaneous detection of IDH1/2 mutations and clinically relevant MGMT methylation in fresh biopsies of diffuse glioma

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40478-020-00963-0

关键词

Glioblastoma; MGMT; IDH; Targeted sequencing; CRISPR; Cas9; Long-read sequencing; Nanopore; Molecular marker; Methylation

资金

  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine
  2. Arkansas Biosciences Institute
  3. UAMS Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute Seeds of Science Grant
  4. Helen Adams AMP
  5. Arkansas Research Alliance Endowed Chair
  6. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [P20GM125503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular biomarkers provide both diagnostic and prognostic results for patients with diffuse glioma, the most common primary brain tumor in adults. Here, we used a long-read nanopore-based sequencing technique to simultaneously assessIDHmutation status andMGMTmethylation level in 4 human cell lines and 8 fresh human brain tumor biopsies. Currently, these biomarkers are assayed separately, and results can take days to weeks. We demonstrated the use of nanopore Cas9-targeted sequencing (nCATS) to identifyIDH1andIDH2mutations within 36 h and compared this approach against currently used clinical methods. nCATS was also able to simultaneously provide high-resolution evaluation ofMGMTmethylation levels not only at the promoter region, as with currently used methods, but also at CpGs across the proximal promoter region, the entirety of exon 1, and a portion of intron 1. We compared the methylation levels of all CpGs toMGMTexpression in all cell lines and tumors and observed a positive correlation between intron 1 methylation andMGMTexpression. Finally, we identified single nucleotide variants in 3 target loci. This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of using nCATS as a clinical tool for cancer precision medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据