4.7 Article

The Association between Neighborhood Amenities and Cognitive Function: Role of Lifestyle Activities

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072109

关键词

lifestyle activity; neighborhood amenities; mild cognitive impairment; global cognitive impairment; older adults

资金

  1. Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant (Comprehensive Research on Aging and Health) [H23-tyoujyu-ippan-001]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP19K24188]
  3. National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Japan [22-16]
  4. [23300205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many of the modifiable risk factors for dementia are lifestyle-related, and multidomain interventions tailored to individual lifestyles are recommended to prevent cognitive decline and dementia. However, studies of the relationship between the environment and cognitive function have shown that cognitive disorders and dementia are more prevalent in rural areas than in urban areas. The purpose of this study was to clarify the role of lifestyle activities on the association between neighborhood amenities and cognitive function. Our data were measured between August 2011 and February 2012. Participants comprised 3786 older adults (mean age: 71.5 years, standard deviation (SD) = +/- 5.2). We categorized neighborhood amenities as institutional resources that promote cognitively beneficial activities such as physical activity. We calculated the Walk Score(R)for all participants using their home address and divided them into three groups. We assessed their 12 lifestyle activities performed outdoors. Cognitive function was measured via Mini-Mental Status Exam, word list memory, attention, executive function, and processing speed. We found that participants who were more likely to report many lifestyle activities were more likely to have normal cognition, even in areas where neighborhood amenities were scarce. The clinical significance of this study is that increased lifestyle activity contributes to the prevention of cognitive decline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据