4.7 Article

Nectin4 is a novel TIGIT ligand which combines checkpoint inhibition and tumor specificity

期刊

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000266

关键词

immunology

资金

  1. Einstein Kaye scholarship
  2. Israel Innovation Authority (Kamin grant)
  3. Israel Science Foundation (Moked grant)
  4. GIF Foundation
  5. ICRF professorship grant
  6. ISF Israel-China grant
  7. Ministry of Science and Technology grant
  8. grant 'Strengthening the capacity of CerVirVac for research in virus immunology and vaccinology' [KK.01.1.1.01.0006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The use of checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized cancer therapy. Unfortunately, these therapies often cause immune-related adverse effects, largely due to a lack of tumor specificity. Methods We stained human natural killer cells using fusion proteins composed of the extracellular portion of various tumor markers fused to the Fc portion of human IgG1, and identified Nectin4 as a novel TIGIT ligand. Next, we generated a novel Nectin4 blocking antibody and demonstrated its efficacy as a checkpoint inhibitor in killing assays and in vivo. Results We identify Nectin4 to be a novel ligand of TIGIT. We showed that, as opposed to all other known TIGIT ligands, which bind also additional receptors, Nectin4 interacts only with TIGIT. We show that the TIGIT-Nectin4 interaction inhibits natural killer cell activity, a critical part of the innate immune response. Finally, we developed blocking Nectin4 antibodies and demonstrated that they enhance tumor killing in vitro and in vivo. Conclusion We discovered that Nectin4 is a novel ligand for TIGIT and demonstrated that specific antibodies against it enhance tumor cell killing in vitro and in vivo. Since Nectin4 is expressed almost exclusively on tumor cells, our Nectin4-blocking antibodies represent a combination of cancer specificity and immune checkpoint activity, which may prove more effective and safe for cancer immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据