4.4 Article

Statistical properties of homogeneous and isotropic turbulence in He II measured via particle tracking velocimetry

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS
卷 5, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.084602

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR-1807291]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0020113]
  3. NSF [DMR-1644779]
  4. state of Florida
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0020113] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite being a quantum two-fluid system, superfluid helium-4 (He II) is observed to behave similarly to classical fluids when a flow is generated by mechanical forcing. This similarity has brought up the feasibility of utilizing He II for high Reynolds number classical turbulence research, considering the small kinematic viscosity of He II. However, it has been suggested that the nonclassical dissipation mechanism in He II at small scales may alter its turbulent statistics and intermittency. In this work, we report our study of a nearly homogeneous and isotropic turbulence (HIT) generated by a towed grid in He II. We measure the velocity field using particle tracking velocimetry with solidified deuterium particles as the tracers. By correlating the velocities measured simultaneously on different particle trajectories or at different times along the same particle trajectory, we are able to conduct both Eulerian and Lagrangian flow analyses. Spatial velocity structure functions obtained through the Eulerian analysis show scaling behaviors in the inertial subrange similar to that for classical HIT but with enhanced intermittency. The Lagrangian analysis allows us to examine the flow statistics down to below the dissipation length scale. Interestingly, abnormal deviations from the classical scaling behaviors are observed in this regime. We discuss how these deviations may relate to the motion of quantized vortices in the superfluid component in He II.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据