4.6 Article

Efficient Low-Temperature Cycling of Lithium Metal Anodes by Tailoring the Solid-Electrolyte Interphase

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 5, 期 7, 页码 2411-2420

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01209

关键词

-

资金

  1. Early Career Faculty grant from NASA's Space Technology Research Grants Program
  2. National Science Foundation [ECCS1542174]
  3. Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research under ONR [N00014-19-1-2195]
  4. Sloan Research Fellowship in Chemistry from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  5. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-1650044]
  6. Sloan Foundation MPHD Program Scholarship
  7. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office, Advanced Battery Materials Research (BMR) program of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-EE0007803, DE-EE0007787]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Operation of Li-ion batteries below -20 degrees C is hindered by low electrolyte conductivity and sluggish solid-state diffusion in electrodes. Li metal anodes show promise for low-temperature operation, but few electrolyte compositions exhibit high conductivity at reduced temperature while also allowing Li electrodeposition/stripping with high Coulombic efficiency. Here, we show that the Coulombic efficiency of Li metal anodes can be substantially improved at low temperatures (-60 degrees C) by tailoring the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) structure through the use of two classes of electrolyte solvents: cyclic carbonates and ethers. Cryogenic transmission electron microscopy and other methods show that fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) induces temperature-dependent changes in the chemistry and structure of the SEI to be abundant with LiF and Li2CO3, while O-17 nuclear magnetic resonance and molecular dynamics calculations show that FEC affects the solvation behavior and SEI formation process this new in electrolyte system. Our results demonstrate the promise of rechargeable Li-metal batteries to enable energy storage over a broad temperature range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据