4.2 Article

Convolutional neural network-based person tracking using overhead views

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1550147720934738

关键词

Convolutional neural network; person detection; person tracking; overhead views; Faster region convolutional neural network; Generic Object Tracking Using Regression Networks

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University (PNU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, through the Fast-track Research Funding Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In video surveillance, person tracking is considered as challenging task. Numerous computer vision, machine and deep learning-based techniques have been developed in recent years. Majority of these techniques are based on frontal view images/video sequences. The advancement of convolutional neural network reforms the way of object tracking. The network layers of convolutional neural network models trained on a number of images or video sequences improve speed and accuracy of object tracking. In this work, the generalization performance of existing pre-trained deep learning models have investigated for overhead view person detection and tracking, under different experimental conditions. The object tracking method Generic Object Tracking Using Regression Networks (GOTURN) which has been yielding outstanding tracking results in recent years is explored for person tracking using overhead views. This work mainly focused on overhead view person tracking using Faster region convolutional neural network (Faster-RCNN) in combination with GOTURN architecture. In this way, the person is first identified in overhead view video sequences and then tracked using a GOTURN tracking algorithm. Faster-RCNN detection model achieved the true detection rate ranging from 90% to 93% with a minimum false detection rate up to 0.5%. The GOTURN tracking algorithm achieved similar results with the success rate ranging from 90% to 94%. Finally, the discussion is made on output results along with future direction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据