4.6 Article

Novel Ecogenic Plasmonic Biohybrids as Multifunctional Bioactive Coatings

期刊

COATINGS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings10070659

关键词

silver nanoparticles; garden herbs; pectin; green design; bioperformances

资金

  1. JINR-Romania of JINR-Romania (University of Bucharest) [48/2020, 04-4-1121-2015/2020, 75/2020, 04-4-1141-2020/2022, 269/20.05.2020]
  2. Nucleu Programme at I.N.F.L.P.R., LAPLAS IV [16N/08.02.2019]
  3. Romanian National Authority for Research and Innovation [PN 18 09 02 02/2018, PN 19 06 02 03/2019, PN19-030101, 21N/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of the present study is the valorization of natural resources and the recycling of vegetal wastes by converting them into novel plasmonic bio-active hybrids. Thus, a green approach was used to design pectin-coated bio-nanosilver. Silver nanoparticles were generated from two common garden herbs (Mentha piperitaandAmaranthus retroflexus), and pectin was extracted from lemon peels. The samples were characterized by the following methods: Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), dynamic light scattering (DLS), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)-Energy-dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX), and zeta potential measurements. Microscopic investigations revealed the spherical shape and the nano-scale size of the prepared biohybrids. Their bioperformances were checked in terms of antioxidant and antibacterial activity. The developed plasmonic materials exhibited a strong ability to scavenge short-life (96.1% divided by 98.7%) and long-life (39.1% divided by 91%) free radicals. Microbiological analyses demonstrated an impressive antibacterial effectiveness of pectin-based hybrids againstEscherichia coli. The results are promising, and the obtained biomaterials could be used in many bio-applications, especially as antioxidant and antimicrobial biocoatings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据