4.4 Article

Lentiviral Vector Production Titer Is Not Limited in HEK293T by Induced Intracellular Innate Immunity

期刊

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2019.11.021

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilIndustrial Biotechnology Catalyst
  2. Great Ormond Street Biomedical Research Centre Springboard Fellowship
  3. NIH
  4. Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
  5. Wellcome Trust [104807/Z/14/Z, 108183/Z/15/Z]
  6. European Research Council under the European Union
  7. MRC [MR/S023380/1, G0801172] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most gene therapy lentiviral vector (LV) production platforms employ HEK293T cells expressing the oncogenic SV40 large T-antigen (TAg) that is thought to promote plasmid-mediated gene expression. Studies on other viral oncogenes suggest that TAg may also inhibit the intracellular autonomous innate immune system that triggers defensive antiviral responses upon detection of viral components by cytosolic sensors. Here we show that an innate response can be generated after HIV-1-derived LV transfection in HEK293T cells, particularly by the transgene, yet, remarkably, this had no effect on LV titer. Further, overexpression of DNA sensing pathway components led to expression of inflammatory cytokine and interferon (IFN) stimulated genes but did not result in detectable IFN or CXCL10 and had no impact on LV titer. Exogenous IFN-beta also did not affect LV production or transduction efficiency in primary T cells. Additionally, manipulation of TAg did not affect innate antiviral responses, but stable expression of TAg boosted vector production in HEK293 cells. Our findings demonstrate a measure of innate immune competence in HEK293T cells but, crucially, show that activation of inflammatory signaling is uncoupled from cytokine secretion in these cells. This provides new mechanistic insight into the unique suitability of HEK293T cells for LV manufacture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据