4.5 Article

Characterization of African Equatorial Ionization Anomaly During the Maximum Phase of Solar Cycle 24

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019JA027066

关键词

African equatorial ionization anomaly; station-to-trough ratio; total electron content; conjugate pairs; solar cycle 24

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study characterizes the African equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) during the maximum phase of Solar Cycle 24 (2012-2015). Total electron content (TEC) data were obtained from a chain of 13 African Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers (within 36-42 degrees E geographic longitude; 29 degrees N to 10 degrees S geographic latitude; +/- 20 degrees N magnetic latitude) to study quiet time variations of TEC and thereafter construct the EIA profiles. The correlations of TEC for pairs of conjugate stations within the African EIA were determined. TEC station-to-trough ratio (TEC-STR) was used as an index to determine the strength of the EIA crests. Furthermore, the variability of the EIA crests on a 3-hourly basis over each month was investigated. Overall, equinoxes recorded the highest values of TEC, with the widest latitudinal location of the EIA crests, and June solstice recorded the least, with the characteristic equatorward collapse of the EIA crests. TEC and the location of the crests of the EIA also increased with solar activity. TEC showed good correlations for conjugate pairs of stations, especially for stations closer to the trough. The African EIA morphology showed asymmetry in the locations of the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and Southern Hemisphere (SH) crests. The formation of EIA starts around 0600-0800 LT and decays around 2100-2300 LT. Generally, SH crest forms first before NH crest and also decays first; we attributed this to the effects of the meridional neutral winds. Comparing TEC at African EIA crests with other longitudinal sectors, the Asian sector recorded the highest TEC, while the American sector recorded the least.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据