4.6 Article

Prevalence and Demographic Correlates of Poor Sleep Quality Among Frontline Health Professionals in Liaoning Province, China During the COVID-19 Outbreak

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00520

关键词

COVID-19; China; health professionals; sleep quality; Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

资金

  1. University of Macau [MYRG2019-00066-FHS]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1311600, 2016YFC1306900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Little empirical evidence is known about the sleep quality of frontline health professionals working in isolation units or hospitals during the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in China. This study thus aimed to examine the prevalence of poor sleep quality and its demographic and correlates among frontline health professionals. Methods This is a multicenter, cross-sectional survey conducted in Liaoning province, China. Sleep quality was measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Results A total of 1,931 frontline health professionals were recruited. The prevalence of poor sleep quality was 18.4% (95%CI: 16.6%-20.11%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that older age (OR=1.043, 95%CI=1.026-1.061,P< 0.001), being nurse (OR=3.132, 95%CI=1.727-5.681,P< 0.001), and working in outer emergency medical team (OR=1.755, 95%CI=1.029-3.064,P=0.039) were positively associated with poor sleep quality. Participants who were familiar with crisis response knowledge were negatively associated with poor sleep quality (OR=0.70, 95%CI=0.516-0.949,P=0.021). Conclusion The prevalence of poor sleep quality was relatively low among frontline health professionals during the COVID-19 epidemic. Considering the negative impact of poor sleep quality on health professionals' health outcomes and patient outcomes, regularly screening and timely treatments are warranted to reduce the likelihood of poor sleep quality in health professionals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据