4.7 Article

Dry mechanical-electrochemical polishing of selective laser melted 316L stainless steel

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 193, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108840

关键词

Selective laser melting; 316L stainless steel; Mechanical and electrochemical polishing; Surface roughness; Post-processing

资金

  1. Ministry of Education - Singapore AcRF Tier 2 [MOE2018-T2-1-140]
  2. A*STAR AME IAF-PP [A1893a0031, A19E1a0097]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775562]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper aims to improve the surface quality of 316L stainless steel parts manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM) using dry mechanical-electrochemical polishing (DMECP). DMECP is an advanced surface finishing method combining the advantages of both mechanical and electrochemical polishing techniques in a more environmentally friendly manner. In this paper, the SLM process-related defects causing poor surface quality are analysed first. The material removal mechanism of DMECP is investigated to continuously remove the oxide layers formed during polishing. Surface morphology and roughness evolution under different polishing conditions are characterised. The top surface roughness can be reduced by over 91% from 8.72 mu m to 0.75 mu m compared to side surface by over 93% from 12.10 to 0.80 mu m. The material removal on the top surface is more efficient than that on the side surface under the same polishing condition. The secondary defects formed during polishing can be removed using mechanical polishing mode. The chemical element composition of the polished surface exhibits almost identical content to the initial 316L powders. Compared with the initial dark and rough surfaces, the results validate the capability of DMECP as an effective tool to improve the SLM surface quality and achieve a mirror finish. (c) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据