4.7 Article

Quantitative prediction of grain boundary misorientation effect on twin transmission in hexagonal metals

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 192, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108745

关键词

Twinning; Microstructure; Grain boundary; Titanium; Electron backscatter diffraction

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0300801]
  2. Equipment Improvement Program of CAEP [2017C0115]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51401019]
  4. Beijing Laboratory of Metallic Materials and Processing for Modern Transportation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intergranular twinning shear transmission through twin-twin accommodation, which plays an important role on microstructure evolution, is often observed in deformed hexagonal metals. The shear transmitted between two connected twins is m's, where m' is the geometrical compatibility factor and s is the magnitude of the original shear. However, the quantitative correlation between the grain boundary misorientation (GBM) and m' factor for shear transmission is unknown. In the present study, we developed an m'-GBM map to tackle this problem. The map is applied to {11 (2) over bar2}-{11 (2) over bar2}, {11 (2) over bar2}-{11 (2) over bar4} and {11 (2) over bar4}-{11 (2) over bar4} twin pairs in Ti, which have rarely been reported before but are profuse in a cryorolled state. Favorable GBM for the formation of these twin pairs is revealed by the map. Specifically, the map shows that low GBM angles (<15 degrees) are conducive to the formation of {11<(2)over bar>2}-{11 (2) over bar2} and {11 (2) over bar4}-{11 (2) over bar4} twin pairs. The map also reveals that both the {11 (2) over bar2}-{11 (2) over bar2} and {11 (2) over bar2}-{11 (2) over bar4} twin pairs tend to occur at grain boundaries with media angles (15 degrees-45 degrees), depending on the location of the corresponding GBM axis in the m'-GBM map. These predictions were then verified by experimental analysis. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据