4.2 Article

Ultrafast x-ray and electron scattering of free molecules: A comparative evaluation

期刊

STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS-US
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/4.0000010

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0017995, DE-SC0020276]
  2. DOE Office of the Science Graduate Student Research (SCGSR) program
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0020276, DE-SC0017995] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resolving gas phase molecular motions with simultaneous spatial and temporal resolution is rapidly coming within the reach of x-ray Free Electron Lasers (XFELs) and Mega-electron-Volt (MeV) electron beams. These two methods enable scattering experiments that have yielded fascinating new results, and while both are important methods for determining transient molecular structures in photochemical reactions, it is important to understand their relative merits. In the present study, we evaluate the respective scattering cross sections of the two methods and simulate their ability to determine excited state molecular structures in light of currently existing XFEL and MeV source parameters. Using the example of optically excited N-methyl morpholine and simulating the scattering patterns with shot noise, we find that the currently achievable signals are superior with x-ray scattering for equal samples and on a per-shot basis and that x-ray scattering requires fewer detected signal counts for an equal fidelity structure determination. Importantly, within the independent atom model, excellent structure determinations can be achieved for scattering vectors only to about 5 angstrom (-1), leaving larger scattering vector ranges for investigating vibrational motions and wavepackets. Electron scattering has a comparatively higher sensitivity toward hydrogen atoms, which may point to applications where electron scattering is inherently the preferred choice, provided that excellent signals can be achieved at large scattering angles that are currently difficult to access.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据