4.3 Article

Interactions of zearalanone, α-zearalanol, β-zearalanol, zearalenone-14-sulfate, and zearalenone-14-glucoside with serum albumin

期刊

MYCOTOXIN RESEARCH
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 389-397

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12550-020-00404-w

关键词

Zearalanone; Zearalanols; Zearalenone-14-sulfate; Zearalenone-14-glucoside; Serum albumin; Species differences

资金

  1. Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  2. Janos Laszlo Doctoral Student Research Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The xenoestrogenic mycotoxin zearalenone is aFusarium-derived food and feed contaminant. In mammals, the reduced (e.g., zearalanone, alpha-zearalanol, and beta-zearalanol) and conjugated (e.g., zearalenone-14-sulfate) metabolites of zearalenone are formed. Furthermore, filamentous fungi and plants are also able to convert zearalenone to conjugated derivatives, including zearalenone-14-sulfate and zearalenone-14-glucoside, respectively. Serum albumin is the dominant plasma protein in the circulation; it interacts with certain mycotoxins, affecting their toxicokinetics. In a previous investigation, we demonstrated the remarkable species differences regarding the albumin binding of zearalenone and zearalenols. In the current study, the interactions of zearalanone, alpha-zearalanol, beta-zearalanol, zearalenone-14-sulfate, and zearalenone-14-glucoside with human, bovine, porcine, and rat serum albumins were examined, employing fluorescence spectroscopy and affinity chromatography. Zearalanone, zearalanols, and zearalenone-14-sulfate form stable complexes with albumins tested (K= 9.3 x 10(3)to 8.5 x 10(5)L/mol), while the albumin binding of zearalenone-14-glucoside seems to be weak. Zearalenone-14-sulfate formed the most stable complexes with albumins examined. Considerable species differences were observed in the albumin binding of zearalenone metabolites, which may have a role in the interspecies differences regarding the toxicity of zearalenone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据