4.4 Article

Taxonomy and phylogeny of Sidera (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota): four new species and keys to species of the genus

期刊

MYCOKEYS
卷 -, 期 68, 页码 115-135

出版社

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.68.53561

关键词

Phylogcny; Rickenellaceae; taxonomy; wood-rotting fungi

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1802231, 31900019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sidera is a polypore genus with white to cream or buff basidiomata, whose species in Hymenochaetales are poorly known. We study the phylogeny and diversity of Sidera based on our recent collections from tropic and subtropic Asian-Pacific regions. Phylogenetic analyses based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and nuclear large subunit (nLSU) ribosomal RNA gene regions indicate that ten terminal lineages are well supported within Sidera. Based on morphological examination and phylogeny, four new species, viz. Sidera minutissima, S. parallela, S. srilankensis and S. tenuis are described, and a new combination, Sidera minutipora, is proposed. All these species are illustrated. Sidera minutissima is characterized by tiny basidiomata with bluish pores when fresh, generative hyphae dominating at the dissepiment edges, the presence of cystidioles, and allantoid basidiospores measuring 3.8-4.4 x 0.9-1.3 mu m. Sidera pandlela differs from other poroid species in the genus by having parallel tramal hyphae in combination with lunate basidiospores measuring 2.8-3.3 x 0.9-1.2 mu m. Sidera srilankensis have generative and skeletal hyphae co-dominating at the dissepiment edges, and lunate basidiospores measuring 3.5-4 x 1-1.3 mu m. Sidera tenuis is distinguished by small pores (8-10 per mm) and relatively long allantoid basidiospores measuring 4.2-5 x 0.8-1 mu m. Sidera minutipora is characterized by buff to olivaceous buff basidiomata when dry, 5-7 pores per mm, rosette-like crystals rare, and allantoid basidiospores measuring 3.7-4.3 x 1-1.3 mu m. An identification key to all accepted species is provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据