4.7 Review

Factors influencing peak bone mass gain

期刊

FRONTIERS OF MEDICINE
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 53-69

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11684-020-0748-y

关键词

peak bone mass; children; adolescents; genetic; risk factors

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [LR17H070001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871831]
  3. MRC [MC_PC_19009] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone mass is crucial for osteoporosis and fracture risk. Factors such as race, gender, genetics, and lifestyle habits influence peak bone mass, with lifestyle factors playing a significant role in optimizing bone health and reducing osteoporosis risk in later life. Maximizing peak bone mass in adolescence and young adulthood can help reduce the risk of low bone mass or osteoporosis in the future.
Bone mass is a key determinant of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Epidemiologic studies have shown that a 10% increase in peak bone mass (PBM) at the population level reduces the risk of fracture later in life by 50%. Low PBM is possibly due to the bone loss caused by various conditions or processes that occur during adolescence and young adulthood. Race, gender, and family history (genetics) are responsible for the majority of PBM, but other factors, such as physical activity, calcium and vitamin D intake, weight, smoking and alcohol consumption, socioeconomic status, age at menarche, and other secondary causes (diseases and medications), play important roles in PBM gain during childhood and adolescence. Hence, the optimization of lifestyle factors that affect PBM and bone strength is an important strategy to maximize PBM among adolescents and young people, and thus to reduce the low bone mass or osteoporosis risk in later life. This review aims to summarize the available evidence for the common but important factors that influence bone mass gain during growth and development and discuss the advances of developing high PBM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据