4.8 Article

Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys Promote Angio-Osteogenesis to Enhance Bone Repair

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 7, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202000800

关键词

angiogenesis; biodegradable metals; osteogenesis

资金

  1. Clarendon Scholarship from The Clarendon Fund
  2. Industrial Core Technology Development Program - Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) [10077595]
  3. KIST Intramural Grant [2E3034, 2E30590]
  4. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Discovery Program
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10077595] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biodegradable metallic materials represent a potential step-change technology that may revolutionize the treatment of broken bones. Implants made with biodegradable metals are significantly stronger than their polymer counterparts and fully biodegradable in vivo, removing the need for secondary surgery or long-term complications. Here, it is shown how clinically approved Mg alloy promotes improved bone repair using an integrated state of the art fetal mouse metatarsal assay coupled with in vivo preclinical studies, second harmonic generation, secretome array analysis, perfusion bioreactor, and high-resolution 3D confocal imaging of vasculature within skeletal tissue, to reveal a vascular-mediated pro-osteogenic mechanism controlling enhanced tissue regeneration. The optimized mechanical properties and corrosion rate of the Mg alloy lead to a controlled release of metallic Mg, Ca, and Zn ions at a rate that facilitates both angiogenesis and coupled osteogenesis for better bone healing, without causing adverse effects at the implantation site. The findings from this study support ongoing development and refinement of biodegradable metal systems to act as crucial portal technologies with significant potential to improve many clinical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据