3.8 Article

Soft Hydrogels for Balancing Cell Proliferation and Differentiation

期刊

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 4687-4701

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00854

关键词

hydrogel; cell; osteogenesis; stiffness; BMP-2

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Sonderforschungsbereich (German Science Foundation Collaborative Research Center
  2. DFG) [SFB TRR79 TP M09, TP B05]
  3. Max Planck Society
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51973129]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogels have been widely explored for the delivery of cells in a variety of regenerative medicine applications due to their ability to mimic both the biochemical and physical cues of cell microniches. For bone regeneration, in particular, stiff hydrogels mimicking osteoid stiffness have been utilized due to the fact that stiff substrates favor stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Unlike cell adhesion in two dimensions, threedimensional hydrogels offer mechanical stimulation but limit the cell spreading and growth due to the dense matrix network. Therefore, we designed degradable, soft hydrogels (similar to 0.5 kPa) mimicking the soft bone marrow stiffness, with incorporated matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-cleavable sites and RGD-based adhesive sites, to enhance the spreading and proliferation of the encapsulated cells, which are commonly inhibited in nondegradable and/or stiff implants. When the hydrogels were cultured on rigid surfaces to mirror the microenvironment of bone defects in vivo, the cells were shown to migrate toward the interface and differentiate down the osteogenic lineage, enhanced by the codelivery of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2). Furthermore, this soft hydrogel might find applications in therapeutic interventions since it is easily injectable and cost-efficient. Taken together, we have designed a new system to balance cell growth and differentiation for improving hydrogel-based bone regenerative medicine strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据