4.5 Article

Phase-Matching Quantum Cryptographic Conferencing

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.024010

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Science
  2. National Fundamental Research Program
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11575174, 11374287, 11574297, 11875173, 11674193]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0303900, 2017YFA0304004]
  5. Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies
  6. Zhongguancun Haihua Institute for Frontier Information Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantum cryptographic conferencing (QCC) holds promise for distributing information-theoretic secure keys among multiple users over a long distance. Limited by the fragility of Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states, QCC networks based on directly distributing GHZ states over a long distance still face a big challenge. Another two potential approaches are measurement device-independent QCC and conference-key agreement with single-photon interference, which were proposed on the basis of the postselection of GHZ states and the postselection of the W state, respectively. However, implementations of the former protocol are still heavily constrained by the transmission rate eta of optical channels and the complexity of the setups for postselecting GHZ states. Meanwhile, the latter protocol cannot be cast as a measurement device-independent prepare-and-measure scheme. Combining the idea of postselecting GHZ states and recently proposed twin-field quantum-key-distribution protocols, we report a QCC protocol based on weak coherent-state interferences named phase-matching quantum cryptographic conferencing, which is immune to all detector side-channel attacks. The proposed protocol can improve the key-generation rate from O(eta(N)) to O(eta(N-1)) compared with the measurement device-independent QCC protocols. Meanwhile, it can be easily scaled up to multiple parties due to its simple setup.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据