4.7 Article

Characterisation of two-stage ignition in diesel engine-relevant thermochemical conditions using direct numerical simulation

期刊

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
卷 172, 期 -, 页码 326-341

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.06.010

关键词

Diesel-relevant; Autoignition; Edge flame; Cool flame; Negative temperature coefficient; Direct numerical simulation

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Combustion Energy Frontier Research Center
  3. Energy Frontier Research Center - US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001198]
  4. United States Department of Energy [DE-AC04-94AL85000]
  5. Australian NCI National Facility through the National Computational Merit Allocation Scheme and Intersect Australia partner share
  6. Pawsey Supercomputing Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the goal of providing a more detailed fundamental understanding of ignition processes in diesel engines, this study reports analysis of a direct numerical simulation (DNS) database. In the DNS, a pseudo turbulent mixing layer of dimethyl ether (DME) at 400 K and air at 900 K is simulated at a pressure of 40 atmospheres. At these conditions, DME exhibits a two-stage ignition and resides within the negative temperature coefficient (NTC) regime of ignition delay times, similar to diesel fuel. The analysis reveals a complex ignition process with several novel features. Autoignition occurs as a distributed, two-stage event. The high-temperature stage of ignition establishes edge flames that have a hybrid premixed/autoignition flame structure similar to that previously observed for lifted laminar flames at similar thermochemical conditions. A combustion mode analysis based on key radical species illustrates the multi-stage and multi-mode nature of the ignition process and highlights the substantial modelling challenge presented by diesel combustion. (C) 2016 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据