4.7 Article

Workers' Exposure Assessment during the Production of Graphene Nanoplatelets in R&D Laboratory

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano10081520

关键词

nanotechnologies; graphene nanoplatelets; 2D nanostructures; occupational safety and health; exposure assessment; risk mitigation

资金

  1. Regione Lazio Project [000327_18_AP_SARTO/LAZIO_INNOVA_SMART_EMA]
  2. [CUP B86C18000920005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Widespread production and use of engineered nanomaterials in industrial and research settings raise concerns about their health impact in the workplace. In the last years, graphene-based nanomaterials have gained particular interest in many application fields. Among them, graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) showed superior electrical, optical and thermal properties, low-cost and availability. Few and conflicting results have been reported about toxicity and potential effects on workers' health, during the production and handling of these nanostructures. Due to this lack of knowledge, systematic approaches are needed to assess risks and quantify workers' exposure to GNPs. This work applies a multi-metric approach to assess workers' exposure during the production of GNPs, based on the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) methodology by integrating real-time measurements and personal sampling. In particular, we analyzed the particle number concentration, the average diameter and the lung deposited surface area of airborne nanoparticles during the production process conducted by thermal exfoliation in two different ways, compared to the background. These results have been integrated by electron microscopic and spectroscopic analysis on the filters sampled by personal impactors. The study identifies the process phases potentially at risk for workers and reports quantitative information about the parameters that may influence the exposure in order to propose recommendations for a safer design of GNPs production process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据