4.7 Article

Naturally occurring SARS-CoV-2 gene deletions close to the spike S1/S2 cleavage site in the viral quasispecies of COVID19 patients

期刊

EMERGING MICROBES & INFECTIONS
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 1900-1911

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1806735

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; deletions; quasispecies; NGS; respiratory virus; diversity

资金

  1. Direccio General de Recerca i Innovacio en Salut (DGRIS) Catalan Health Ministry Generalitat de Catalunya through Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR)
  2. European Development Regional Fund (ERDF)A way to achieve Europe by Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases [REIPI RD16/0016/0003]
  3. Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnologico Industrial (CDTI) from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Business [IDI-20200297]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein, the viral mediator for binding and entry into the host cell, has sparked great interest as a target for vaccine development and treatments with neutralizing antibodies. Initial data suggest that the virus has low mutation rates, but its large genome could facilitate recombination, insertions, and deletions, as has been described in other corona viruses. Here, we deep-sequenced the complete SARS-CoV-2Sgene from 18 patients (10 with mild and 8 with severe COVID-19), and found that the virus accumulates deletions upstream and very close to the S1/S2 cleavage site (PRRAR/S), generating a frameshift with appearance of a stop codon. These deletions were found in a small percentage of the viral quasi species (2.2%) in samples from all the mild and only half the severe COVID-19 patients. Our results suggest that the virus may generate free S1 protein released to the circulation. We suggest that natural selection has favoured a Don't burn down the house strategy, in which free S1 protein may compete with viral particles for the ACE2 receptor, thus reducing the severity of the infection and tissue damage without losing transmission capability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据