4.5 Article

Extracellular matrix proteins are time-dependent and regional-specific markers in experimental diffuse brain injury

期刊

BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1767

关键词

extracellular matrix; primary somatosensory barrel cortex; protein; S1BF; traumatic brain injury; ventral posterior medial; ventral posterior medial thalamus

资金

  1. Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital
  2. School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering at Arizona State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The extracellular matrix (ECM) provides structural support for neuronal, glial, and vascular components of the brain, and regulates intercellular signaling required for cellular morphogenesis, differentiation and homeostasis. We hypothesize that the pathophysiology of diffuse brain injury impacts the ECM in a multi-dimensional way across brain regions and over time, which could facilitate damage and repair processes. Methods: Experimental diffuse TBI was induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats (325-375 g) by midline fluid percussion injury (FPI); uninjured sham rats serve as controls. Tissue from the cortex, thalamus, and hippocampus was collected at 15 min, 1, 2, 6, and 18 hr postinjury as well as 1, 3, 7, and 14 days postinjury. All samples were quantified by Western blot for glycoproteins: fibronectin, laminin, reelin, and tenascin-C. Band intensities were normalized to sham and relative to beta-actin. Results: In the cortex, fibronectin decreased significantly at 15 min, 1 hr, and 2 hr postinjury, while tenascin-C decreased significantly at 7 and 14 days postinjury. In the thalamus, reelin decreased significantly at 2 hr, 3 and 14 days postinjury. In the hippocampus, tenascin-C increased significantly at 15 min and 7 days postinjury. Conclusion: Acute changes in the levels of these glycoproteins suggest involvement in circuit dismantling, whereas postacute levels may indicate a restorative or regenerative response associated with recovery from TBI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据