4.7 Article

Stimuli-responsive poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide)-co-tyrosine@gadolinium: Iron oxide nanoparticle-based nanotheranostic for cancer diagnosis and treatment

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 248-258

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.02.053

关键词

Dual responsive polymer; Gadolinium doped iron oxide nanoparticle; T-1 contrast agent; Hyperthermia; Targeted drug delivery

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [SB/FT/CS-155/2012, SR/FTP/PS-157/2011]
  2. Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad [FRS/34/2012-2013/APH, FRS/43/2013-2014/AC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we have prepared a stimuli-responsive polymer modified gadolinium doped iron oxide nanoparticle (poly@Gd-MNPs) as cancer theranostic agent. The responsive polymer is composed of the poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide)-co-tyrosine unit, which shows excellent loading for the anti-cancer drug (methotrexate) and stimuli dependent release (change in pH and temperature). The in vitro experiment revealed that the poly@Gd-MNPs exhibited T-1-weighted MRI capability (r(1) = 11.314 mM(-1) s(-1)) with good in-vitro hyperthermia response. The prepared poly@Gd-MNPs has generated quick heating (45 degrees C in 2 min) upon exposure to an alternating magnetic field and able to travel a distance of 35 cm in 1 min in the presence of an external magnet. The poly@Gd-MNPs shows 86% of drug loading capacity with 70% drug release in first 2 h. The cytotoxic assay (MTF) demonstrated that the nanoparticle did not affect the viability of normal human fibroblast and efficiently kill the MCF7 cancer cells in the presence of an external magnetic field. To explore the uptake of poly@Gd-MNPs in the cells, bright field cell imaging study was also performed. This study provides a valuable approach for the design of highly sensitive polymer modified gadolinium doped iron oxide-based T-1 contrast agents for cancer theranostics. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据