4.6 Editorial Material

The Culture for Open Innovation Dynamics

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su12125076

关键词

culture; open innovation dynamics; entrepreneurship; intrapreneurship; organizational entrepreneurship

资金

  1. DGIST R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and ICT [19-IT-01, 20-IT-10-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Culture, in its various forms, has always been a critical driver of innovation. This paper focuses on generating some insights into the role of culture for open innovation dynamics. First, because the requirement to understand culture, which can control open innovation complexity, has been augmented, we want to answer the following research question in this study: How can we define or organize culture for open innovation dynamics, which can motivate open innovation dynamics, and control open innovation complexity? Second, we propose a concept model of culture for open innovation dynamics by reviewing the literature on the culture of firms in terms of their traits, organization, static innovation, and dynamic aspects regarding their innovation in entrepreneurship, and we validate said model through an indirect social experiment using the research results of 23 Special Issue papers. Third, the concept model of culture for open innovation dynamics is explained as the interaction between three different entrepreneurship dimensions: Entrepreneurship of novice entrepreneurs, intrapreneurship of employees of an existing firm, and organizational entrepreneurship by the firm itself. According to the balance of three sub-entrepreneurship types, culture for open innovation dynamics can have different aspects, namely, entrepreneurship leading culture for open innovation dynamics, intrapreneurship leading culture for open innovation dynamics, or organizational entrepreneurship leading culture for open innovation dynamics. This paper helps organizations and entrepreneurs to better understand the role that culture plays in boosting open innovation dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据