4.6 Article

Assessing the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems: Taking Stock of the Cross-Scale Dependence

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 12, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su12156236

关键词

conceptual framework; environmental assessment; institutional fit

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2018/00462-8, 2019/04481-0]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [309697/2015-8, 310553/2019-9]
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  4. FAPESP [2015/03804-9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human demands and activities introduce cross-scale pressures in different systems and scales, affecting the provision of ecosystem services and causing an unbalanced effect on human well-being within the territory. The existing institutions are frequently considered panaceas since they do not take into account the different spatial and jurisdictional scales of the social-ecological systems (SES). This paper aims to broaden the existing DPSIR (Drivers-Pressures-State-Impact-Response) assessment frameworks to strengthen the ecosystem approach and promote an integrated cross-scale perspective. The concept of the Cross-scale Ecosystem-Based Assessment (DIET) was developed and applied to a case study on the demand of seafood provisions. The assessment has indicated that the activities related to the specified demand occur at different scales and generate cumulative impacts and pressures on other scales, especially in the coastal zone. The existing responses to address this issue are highly fragmented, both spatially and among sectors. DIET was applied here to the land-sea interface to illustrate how coastal zone governance and management can be improved and how the impact of certain drivers or activities in the SES can be reduced. DIET may help to reduce the governance morbidity and prevent panaceas by fostering the integration of institutions in pursuing flexible, adaptive and fit-for-purpose policies to address complex issues so as to secure social-ecological justice and well-being for all humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据