4.6 Article

Conceptualizing Niche-Regime Dynamics of Energy Transitions from a Political Economic Perspective: Insights from Community-Led Urban Solar in Seoul

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su12124818

关键词

niche-regime dynamics; socio-technical energy transitions; community-led urban solar; political economic perspective; lock-in; South Korea

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee's General Research Fund [12602717]
  2. Hong Kong Baptist University's Faculty Research Grant [FRG2/17-18/096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The complex dynamics between technological niches and regime lock-in are critical in determining the pace and outcomes of energy transitions. The socio-technical transitions literature has received growing scholarly attention, but it lacks consideration of the broader political and economic contexts. This paper aims to advance understanding of socio-technical transitions by conceptualizing niche-regime dynamics from a political economic perspective, with reference to a case study of solar in Seoul. Based on in-depth face-to-face interviews with 18 key stakeholders, we have three findings. Firstly, the politico-economic contexts have created an embedded environment in which five factors have a clear influence on niche-regime dynamics. Secondly, the politico-economic contexts created conducive conditions for niche developments on the one hand, but, on the other hand, have created inhibitive conditions that have cancelled out the positive forces and reinforced lock-in. Thirdly, the processes occur at multi-scalar levels: Community solar niches in Seoul are conditioned by the broader politico-economic contexts at city and national levels. We conclude that sufficient policy attention should be given to the political economy of a national energy system in order to create conducive conditions for community-led niches to realize the full potential that they could offer in energy transitions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据