3.8 Article

Dynamic Control of High-Range Photoresponsivity in a Graphene Nanoribbon Photodetector

期刊

NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s11671-020-03352-7

关键词

Graphene nanoribbons; Photodetector; Photoresponsivity

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61775241]
  2. Hunan Province Key Research and Development Project [2019GK2233]
  3. Youth Innovation Team of Central South University [2019012]
  4. Science Project of State Key Laboratory of High-Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University [ZZYJKT2020-12]
  5. Technology Innovation Basic Research Project of Shenzhen [JCYJ20180307151237242]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [1053320182462]
  7. Australian Research Council (ARC Discovery Project) [DP180102976]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene has been demonstrated to be a promising material for optoelectronics and photodetection devices because of its ultra-broadband optical absorption and high carrier mobility. However, its integration with optoelectronic systems has been limited by the zero-bandgap and the lack of a gain mechanism. Herein, we demonstrate a novel photodetector based on the graphene nanoribbons (GRNs) with a sizable bandgap. Utilizing trapping charge at the interface between SiO(2)and light-doped silicon, an ultrahigh gain of 22,400 has been obtained. Our devices show an enhanced photoresponsivity (similar to 800 AW(-1)) while the response speed is still fast (up to 10 mu s). This photoresponsivity is about two orders of magnitude higher compared to that of a previous graphene-based photodetector. The photodetector exhibits a wide-range tunability via source-drain bias and back gate voltage. Our work addresses key challenges for the photodetectors and potentially provides the desired pathway toward practical application of graphene photodetectors that can be externally manipulated by an electric field with fast response speed and high sensitivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据