4.6 Article

Active sites engineering of Pt/CNT oxygen reduction catalysts by atomic layer deposition

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 -, 页码 59-66

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.09.024

关键词

Oxygen reduction; Pt/CNT catalyst; Atomic layer deposition; Active sites

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21922803, 21776077]
  2. Shanghai Natural Science Foundation [17ZR1407300, 17ZR1407500]
  3. Program for the Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning, the Shanghai RisingStar Program [17QA1401200]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composites [oic-201801007]
  5. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering [SKLChe-15C03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding carbon-supported Pt-catalyzed oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) from the perspective of the active sites is of fundamental and practical importance. In this study, three differently sized carbon nanotube-supported Pt nanoparticles (Pt/CNT) are prepared by both atomic layer deposition (ALD) and impregnation methods. The performances of the catalysts toward the ORR in acidic media are comparatively studied to probe the effects of the sizes of the Pt nanoparticles together with their distributions, electronic properties, and local environments. The ALD-Pt/CNT catalysts show much higher ORR activity and selectivity than the impregnation-Pt/CNT catalysts. This outstanding ORR performance is ascribed to the well-controlled Pt particle sizes and distributions, desirable Pt-0 4f binding energy, and the Cl-free Pt surfaces based on the electrocatalytic measurements, catalyst characterizations, and model calculations. The insights reported here could guide the rational design and fine-tuning of carbon-supported Pt catalysts for the ORR. (C) 2019 Science Press and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据