4.7 Article

Comparative Plastid Genomics of NeotropicalBulbophyllum(Orchidaceae; Epidendroideae)

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00799

关键词

plastid genome; Neotropical orchids; molecular evolution; next-generation sequencing; molecular markers

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [311001/2014-9, 308460/2017-0, 203304/2018-7]
  2. Universidad Politecnica Salesiana

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PantropicalBulbophyllum, with similar to 2,200 species, is one of the largest genera in Orchidaceae. Although phylogenetics and taxonomy of the similar to 60 American species in the genus are generally well understood, some species complexes need more study to clearly delimit their component species and provide information about their evolutionary history. Previous research has suggested that the plastid genome includes phylogenetic markers capable of providing resolution at low taxonomic levels, and thus it could be an effective tool if these divergent regions can be identified. In this study, we sequenced the complete plastid genome of eightBulbophyllumspecies, representing five of six Neotropical taxonomic sections. All plastomes conserve the typical quadripartite structure, and, although the general structure of plastid genomes is conserved, differences inndh-gene composition and total length were detected. Total length was determined by contraction and expansion of the small single-copy region, a result of an independent loss of the sevenndhgenes. Selection analyses indicated that protein-coding genes were generally well conserved, but in four genes, we identified 95 putative sites under positive selection. Furthermore, a total of 54 polymorphic simple sequence repeats were identified, for which we developed amplification primers. In addition, we propose 10 regions with potential to improve phylogenetic analyses of NeotropicalBulbophyllumspecies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据