4.7 Article

Providing an Additional Electron Sink by the Introduction of Cyanobacterial Flavodiirons Enhances Growth ofA. thalianaUnder Various Light Intensities

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00902

关键词

A; thaliana; cyanobacteria; flavodiiron proteins; photosynthesis; electron sink; primary metabolism; biomass

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [FKZ 031A280]
  2. National Agency for the Promotion of Science and Technology (ANPCyT, Argentina) [PICT 2017-3080, PICT 2015-3828]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability of plants to maintain photosynthesis in a dynamically changing environment is of central importance for their growth. As the photosynthetic machinery is a sensitive and early target of adverse environmental conditions as those typically found in the field, photosynthetic efficiency is not always optimal. Cyanobacteria, algae, mosses, liverworts and gymnosperms produce flavodiiron proteins (Flvs), a class of electron sinks not represented in angiosperms; these proteins act to mitigate the photoinhibition of photosystem I under high or fluctuating light. Here, genes specifying two cyanobacterial Flvs have been expressed in the chloroplasts ofArabidopsis thalianain an attempt to improve plant growth. Co-expression ofFlv1andFlv3enhanced the efficiency of light utilization, boosting the plant's capacity to accumulate biomass as the growth light intensity was raised. TheFlv1/Flv3transgenics displayed an increased production of ATP, an acceleration of carbohydrate metabolism and a more pronounced partitioning of sucrose into starch. The results suggest that Flvs are able to establish an efficient electron sink downstream of PSI, thereby ensuring efficient photosynthetic electron transport at moderate to high light intensities. The expression of Flvs thus acts to both protect photosynthesis and to control the ATP/NADPH ratio; together, their presence is beneficial for the plant's growth potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据