4.6 Article

Bacterial Community Legacy Effects Following the Agia Zoni II Oil-Spill, Greece

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01706

关键词

Mediterranean; hydrocarbons; Agia Zoni II; oil spill; Alcanivorax; Cycloclasticus; Idiomarina; Greece

资金

  1. National Environmental Research Council (NERC) [NE/R016569/1]
  2. NERC EnvEast [NE/L002582/1]
  3. NERC [NE/P011624/1]
  4. Eastern Academic Research Consortium
  5. NERC [NE/R016569/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In September 2017 the Agia Zoni II sank in the Saronic Gulf, Greece, releasing approximately 500 tonnes of heavy fuel oil, contaminating the Salamina and Athens coastlines. Effects of the spill, and remediation efforts, on sediment microbial communities were quantified over the following 7 months. Five days post-spill, the concentration of measured hydrocarbons within surface sediments of contaminated beaches was 1,093-3,773 mu g g(-1)dry sediment (91% alkanes and 9% polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons), but measured hydrocarbons decreased rapidly after extensive clean-up operations. Bacterial genera known to contain oil-degrading species increased in abundance, includingAlcanivorax,Cycloclasticus,Oleibacter,Oleiphilus, andThalassolituus, and the speciesMarinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticusfrom approximately 0.02 to >32% (collectively) of the total bacterial community. Abundance of genera with known hydrocarbon-degraders then decreased 1 month after clean-up. However, a legacy effect was observed within the bacterial community, wherebyAlcanivoraxandCycloclasticuspersisted for several months after the oil spill in formerly contaminated sites. This study is the first to evaluate the effect of the Agia Zoni II oil-spill on microbial communities in an oligotrophic sea, wherein situoil-spill studies are rare. The results aid the advancement of post-spill monitoring models, which can predict the capability of environments to naturally attenuate oil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据