4.6 Article

Identification of a Compound That Inhibits the Growth of Gram-Negative Bacteria by Blocking BamA-BamD Interaction

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01252

关键词

outer-membrane proteins; Escherichia coli; BamA-BamD; yeast two-hybrid; antibacterial agent

资金

  1. CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine [2017-12M-1-012]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81703575, 81529003]
  3. National Mega-project for Innovative Drugs [2019ZX09721001-004-006]
  4. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups
  5. Funds for International Cooperation and Exchange between China and Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The demand for novel antibiotics is imperative for drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria which causes diverse intractable infection disease in clinic. Here, a comprehensive screening was implemented to identify potential agents that disrupt the assembly of beta-barrel outer-membrane proteins (OMPs) in the outer membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria. The assembly of OMPs requires ubiquitous beta-barrel assembly machinery (BAM). Among the five protein subunits in BAM, the interaction between BamA and BamD is essential for the function of this complex. We first established a yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) system to confirm the interaction between BamA and BamD, and then screened agents that specifically disrupt this interaction. From this screen, we identified a compound IMB-H4 that specially blocks BamA-BamD interaction and selectively inhibits the growth ofEscherichia coliand other Gram-negative bacteria. Moreover, our results suggest that IMB-H4 disrupts BamA-BamD interaction by binding to BamA. Strikingly,E. colicells having been treated with IMB-H4 showed impaired OM integrity and decreased the abundance of OMPs. Therefore, an antibacterial agent was identified successfully using Y2H system, and this compound likely blocks the assembly of OMPs by targeting BamA-BamD interaction in Gram-negative bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据