4.7 Review

Technologically-enhanced psychological interventions for older adults: a scoping review

期刊

BMC GERIATRICS
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01594-9

关键词

Older adults; Aging; Technology; Psychological interventions; Clinical psychology; Healthcare

资金

  1. D3.2 Grant Program (Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The world population is getting older. As life expectancy increases, traditional health care systems are facing different challenges in terms of cost reduction and high-quality service delivery capability. New ways to improve older adults' quality of life have been explored, taking advantage of new technological solutions. Our focus is on the integration of technology in clinical treatments to facilitate or deliver psychological interventions meant to improve well-being in older adults. Our aims were to describe the main technology-based interventions supporting seniors' quality of life or psychological well-being and to provide greater clarity to what is described in the current literature as their effects on seniors' cognitive and psychological outcomes and healthcare policies. Methods We reviewed the scientific literature looking for studies that investigated how technology can be implemented into clinical psychology treatments for older adults. Our search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and CINAHL. The search provided 350 articles, mostly (approximate to 90%) dated after 2002. analysis narrowed the selection to 150 papers, according to their relevance and actuality as judged by a restricted group of independent researchers. Results Through a thematic analysis, we found that virtual reality (VR), robots, telemedicine, software, video games, and smartphone applications could potentially support older adults' psychological treatment with a positive impact on healthcare systems. Conclusion Findings from the literature are encouraging, although most of these results are only preliminary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据