4.6 Article

Assessing the effects of nanoparticle type and concentration on the stability of CO2 foams and the performance in enhanced oil recovery

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.09.083

关键词

Hydrophilic nanoparticles; CO2 foam; Foam stability; Enhanced oil recovery

资金

  1. Research Management Center (RMC) of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia [Q.J13000.21A2.02E38]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Utilizing nanoparticles (NPs) for stabilizing CO2-foams has recently become an interesting subject among petroleum engineers. It has been proven that silica (SiO2) NP is a good agent for stabilizing CO2-foams. Investigating the role of other types of NPs is ongoing and this research attempted to determine and compare the effects of three hydrophilic metal oxide NPs, namely aluminium oxide (Al2O3), titanium dioxide (TiO2), copper oxide (CuO) as well as the effect of SiO2 on the stability of CO2-foams. For this aim, the listed NPs in concentrations from 0.002 to 0.1 wt% were dispersed in de-ionized water to make suspensions. These suspensions were utilized in a chromatography column to produce foam. The stability of the generated NPs-CO2-foams was determined by measuring the half-life time. The results revealed that the highest stability of NPs-CO2-foams was reached at an optimum concentration of 0.008 wt% for all NP types. Moreover, SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2, and CuO NPs-CO2 foams half-life times were obtained 28.1, 24.6, 20.1, and 17.9min, respectively. In addition, the applicability of generated NPs-CO2 foams on oil displacement through quartz sand porous media was determined. The amounts of oil recoveries via SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2, and CuO NPs-CO2 foams achieved were 71.7%, 65.7%, 58.2%, and 57.3% respectively. Overall, it was found that stability of a NP-CO2-foam is strongly dependent on NP type and concentration, and NP stability against deposition in aqueous phase. Based on the findings, more oil recoveries can be achieved by more stable NP-CO2 foams. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据